This entry was posted on Sunday, March 15th, 2009 at 7:19 pm and is filed under Barack Obama. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Vote Anti Incumbent
Anti incumbent and anti-establishment voting issues and candidates

Obama Same As Bush
I made a mistake. Back at election time, at the last minute I said Obama was the anti incumbent candidate. That was a mistake. I should have stayed with Ron Paul, who I voted for in the primary.
Neither Democrats nor Republicans are worth voting for is you want real change, not just a slogan.
Now that Obama has a start, you can see by the people he has put in his cabinet and key positions, that things remain the same. His appointment of the same insiders who caused some of the problems is disturbing. Most disappointing is this same approach to big spending to cure the economic woes. His letting the Federal Reserve call the shots and the encouraging the American people to spend, spend, spend. It is like the whole system is a ponzi scheme that must keep going or it will fall apart and Obama is just the latest ring leader who gave people false hope for real change.
Is Timothy Geithner better or different than Hank Paulson? Not one bit. How about Lawrence Summers and others? Nope.
Obama promised to get us out of Iraq. But he seems insistence to start again in Afghanistan. Or in Pakistan and other places. Sounds like the industrial military movement is still strong.
What will it take to get a real third party established? What if the whole system really does collapse, will that do it? Stay tuned.
