Bloomberg is anti incumbent in so far as he is fighting the system. Why, just because someone is wealthy, can they no longer be anti incumbent? Seems almost bigoted.

Bloomberg hasn’t a dime of inherited money. He earned every penny he has. His father never made more than $11k a year in his life. Mike got his first degree in electrical engineering, and learned computer programming before going back to school to get his MBA at Harvard. Even to this day, he still rides the subway to work in the morning. And until the news-media made a big story out of it, he even kept his personal home phone number listed in the phone book (once the newspapers listed the number he had to change it and go unlisted, of course).

He’s an astoundingly down to earth guy. Being a jewish New York billionaire is a hard stereotype to overcome in the South, but while I may be a New Yorker by residence, I’m from Tennessee by birth, and I really think a lot of Southerners could appreciate his tell-it-like it is, no BS attitude. He calls it like he sees it, and doesn’t mince words. He’s really not a politician. He’s a businessman. He’s a maverick, for sure, and he’s certainly fighting the system. He’s fighting the system with his wallet. With nothing but sheer brainpower and ambition, he acquired enough wealth to stand up to both political parties. The guy is a force to be reckoned with.

http://www.RunMikeRun.com